Skill Attribution

This chart breaks down a manager’s returns into benchmark, style clone, and skill components over a selected period, highlighting positive vs. negative contributions. Use it to pinpoint whether outperformance comes from style fit or true skill.

Chart Elements

  • Top Panel (Returns vs. Benchmark):
    • Blue Bar: Manager excess return (actual minus benchmark).
    • Orange Bar: Style Clone excess return (clone minus benchmark).
  • Bottom Panel (Attribution):
    • Green Bar: Positive skill return (periods of manager outperformance vs. clone).
    • Red Bar: Negative skill return (periods of underperformance vs. clone).
  • X-Axis: Return percentages (annualized or period-specific).
  • Period: Selected timeframe (e.g., quarterly or custom).

How Skill Attribution Works

Returns decompose as: Benchmark + Style Excess (clone captures factor tilts) + Skill (manager minus clone). Positive skill (green) shows added value from picks/timing; negative (red) flags shortfalls. Style clone excess (orange) reveals if passive style replication beat the broad benchmark.

Key Insights to Spot

  • Skill Impact: Green bars > red indicate net positive alpha from active decisions.
  • Style Strength: Large orange bars show factor tilts driving relative gains.
  • Total Excess: Blue bar = orange + (green – red); mismatches signal attribution accuracy.
  • Period Trends: Compare across quarters to detect consistency.

Actionable Uses

  • Source ID: Distinguish style luck from skill for manager meetings.
  • Trend Analysis: Track if skill flips from positive to negative over time.
  • Benchmark Check: Validate if clone excess aligns with market regimes.
  • Portfolio Decisions: Prioritize managers with persistent green dominance.

Was this article helpful?